Why Every Coach Should Track Load and Fatigue

Coaching has evolved. Tracking hasn’t.

Most coaches today are far better at programming than they were ten years ago.
Exercise selection, progressions, and intensities. All have improved.

But when it comes to tracking load and fatigue, many coaches are still relying on:

• Spreadsheets

• Memory

• Gut feeling

• Or nothing at all

That’s a problem, not because coaches are careless, but because modern training demands better feedback loops.

What “load” really means (and why it matters)

Training load isn’t just weight on the bar.

It’s the total stress imposed on the athlete, including:

• External load (sets, reps, weight, volume)

• Internal load (RPE, effort, perceived difficulty)

• Density (rest times, session structure)

Without tracking load consistently, it becomes impossible to answer basic questions:

• Is this athlete progressing or just accumulating fatigue?

• Is performance improving because of the program, or despite it?

• Are we pushing adaptation or risking regression?

Tracking load gives context to performance.

Fatigue is invisible… until it isn’t

Fatigue doesn’t announce itself clearly.

It shows up subtly:

• Slower bar speed

• Higher RPE at the same load

• Inconsistent session quality

• Reduced motivation or readiness

By the time injuries or performance drops appear, fatigue has often been accumulating for weeks.

Tracking fatigue allows coaches to:

• Adjust volume before performance drops

• Individualize progression instead of guessing

• Separate “hard training” from “too much training.”

Fatigue isn’t the enemy; unmanaged fatigue is.

The problem with spreadsheets and intuition

Spreadsheets can store numbers.
They don’t:

• Highlight trends

• Surface risks

• Connect load to performance outcomes

And intuition, while valuable, is biased by:

• Limited memory

• Recency effects

• Emotional investment in the plan

Good coaching blends experience with data, not one instead of the other.

Better tracking leads to better decisions

When load and fatigue are tracked properly, coaches can:

• See which exercises drive progress

• Identify athletes who respond differently to the same stimulus

• Adjust sessions based on readiness, not guesswork

• Communicate decisions more clearly to athletes

This isn’t about micromanaging training.
It’s about making informed decisions.

Track less. Learn more.

Tracking doesn’t mean tracking everything.

The goal isn’t data overload, it’s clarity:

• Rep-based exercises

• Load + effort

• Simple fatigue signals

• Clear performance trends

The right system makes tracking feel like part of coaching, not admin work.

Coaching is about decisions, and data should support them

The best coaches aren’t those who collect the most data.
They’re the ones who use the right data to make better decisions.

That’s where modern performance tracking is heading.

And that’s exactly why tools like PeakPlan exist.

Want early access?

PeakPlan is being built for strength & conditioning coaches who want to plan better, track smarter, and actually understand performance trends.